Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Blatantly callous.

Doctors have called for a blatantly callous law to direct you to do as you are told by the sham that calls itself a government. Clegg will be all for it because he is an evil controlling nasty pompous little git just like all Lib Dems and all the vicious, spiteful, mindless and useless cretins who vote for them. Cameron will agree because he has less spine than a jellyfish and less brain than a bacterium, just like all those who voted for him. Harsh? No. You voted for it, you got it. Enjoy. Just try voting Labour and see what you get. Proto-prime Monster Moribund is ready to take your calls, useless drones. Expect change if you like. You will not get it.

I did not vote for any party now in Government or even in opposition but I can accept that others did. Okay, I did not want Butch Cameron and the Smokedenial Kid running the country because one is Blair in a new skin and the other is just a skin but fair enough, many people voted me down. Based on my IQ score, the 99% voted me down. Thanks a bunch, dopey tent guys.

None of those people voted for the doctors now declaring new laws. Yet we all know the filthy Tory turncoats and the vile and putrid excresence from Satan's prolapsed rectum that is every Liberal Democrat will accept the word of the unelected pressure-pompous even while they direct their pretend 'people's representatives' to vote against everything the people ask for. Everything from a reconsideration (not a repeal, just a reconsideration, take note Malcolm Bruce you evil bastard) of the extent of the smoking ban to the even higher issue of whether we should be dragged down by the collapsing Fascist monster of the EU.

When you buy a car, remember this. You do not own it. The government owns it. They will tell you what you can and cannot do in that car. You want to spend tens of thousands on a car? Total waste of money. Your money is gone and still the car is not yours. Buy a banger with a long-enough MOT to make it worthwhile and forget about buying new. There is no point.

You can drive as fast as the government decrees and no faster. You cannot even fit winter tyres without it being considered a modification. You drive when allowed and stop when directed. Oh, but you think, the interior of your car is your domain.

Not any more. The interior of your car is decreed Government space. And soon your house and then your head. You can smugly declare it's only about smoking if you like and pretend that the same template has not been applied to everything else already.. Go on, enjoy your smugness. I won't be there when it's your turn and when you come to me for help all you'll hear is 'no'.

Thinking of buying a new car to boost the economy? Spend away. It's your money.

It's not, and never will be, your car.You are just paying extraordinary rent on a bit of Government-owned mobile internal public space plus duty and VAT on top, plus maintenance and running costs with more duty and VAT on top of those too. It's your money, or was, so throw it as far as you like. Pay away, enjoy your chance to look inside that BMW or Bentley you think you own.

If you have still a touch of brain cell function, buy a secondhand cheapo. It's not yours anyway.

If smokers never bought another new car, even Osbourne might notice something.


26 comments:

JuliaM said...

"Such vulnerable groups may be unable to refuse journeys in smoky vehicles, the BMA points out."

We must think of the chiiiillreeeen! And the elllllllderly!

Anonymous said...

Other people are from this day banned from my car on the grounds that, as a responsible and unselfish smoker, I have no wish to endanger passengers' lives and need no law to remind me of my obligations.

Jay

Anonymous said...

Just watched a Labour MP being interviewed re smoking in the car on BBC. He wants it totally banned for all, whether or not you have passengers.
Its to save our lifes people, and also we are a huge burden on the NHS. Cunt.

Xopher said...

Are doctors paid when they attend such meetings as the BMA conference?
The BMA seems to be a lobbying group more interested in social intrusion than doing the job they're trained for.
How many fewer operations are carried out due to their 'union' activities and how much is this costing the NHS?

Sue said...

"Such vulnerable groups may be unable to refuse journeys in smoky vehicles, the BMA points out."

If I were to volunteer to help such vulnerable groups (disabled, elderly etc), they either lump it or take bus, it's their choice!

It's my car!

kitler said...

Have you seen this

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062084/Woman-fined-465-dropping-cigarette-outside-home-vows-pay.html

I like the new term 'eco-crimminals' that my local council 'bosses' have started using. Hope that one catches on.

P T Barnum said...

From the article kitler mentions:

"Nigel Wheeler, service director for Streetcare at Rhondda Cynon Taf Council said: 'Eco-criminals will not be tolerated. The illegal disposal of cigarette related waste is the biggest single problem throughout the area.

'As well as creating unsightly environmental conditions, the offence can attract vermin.

'The Streetcare Enforcement Team will do all in its power to eradicate this type of behaviour.'"

Vermin?! I have visions of rats searching for smokable butts...

And Godwin's Law is unavoidable with Nigel, isn't it?

Fausty said...

Why don't they ban the ultimate "self-harm": suicide?

Why don't they ban MRSA in hospitals?

Why don't they ban drugs which which are only required to provide 5% benefit over that of a placebo, but which cause serious side-effects?

Why doesn't someone hire private detectives to catch these authoritarians doing that which they wish to ban?

And finally, do any of the proponents of this ban have shares/interests in the nicotine patch industry?

James Higham said...

If you have still a touch of brain cell function, buy a secondhand cheapo. It's not yours anyway.


Or alternatively - ride a bike.

Xopher said...

Socio-criminals should be retrained to understand the value of Society and made to realize the harm they are inflicting on the electorate.

Anonymous said...

@James Higham - a woman who sat next to me while we both smoked on a public bench against which my bike was propped asked how I managed to cycle and smoke to which my reply was that I held the fag in one hand and the handlebar with the other.

Jay

Anonymous said...

Would you still be nobbled if you happen to be driving an open top "sports car" with a cig on the go ?
That was me many years ago.

Anonymous said...

Just listened to an oncologist on a radio 5 live prog. that was mentioned in the comments on Frank Davis blog. It is a must listen to, she talked more sense and echoed my own experience than all the anti fanatics put together.

Anonymous said...

I wonder why – for the sake of the cheeldren – none of the “I hate smokers” brigade have suggested banning children from the cars of smokers? Hmm. Strange. Could it possibly be that if the proposal were turned on its head, the outcry would be enormous: “You can’t stop children from getting into cars with friends or relatives if they want to,” “What about the school run for parents who smoke?” “What if there’s an emergency and a smoker can’t take a child to a nearby hospital in their car?” “Why should our little diddums have to walk home amongst all those axe-murderers and paedos when they could be getting a lift?” But really, when you think about it, the same logic applies – it's for the "good of the cheeldren." Because surely the risks of a paedo attack, or a road accident or a child's right to ride in a car of its choosing pale into insignificance beside the deadly risks of a wisp of tobacco smoke ... don't they?

Not that it would bother me in the slightest. Children are already banned from my car, not because I smoke it in, but because I think they’re a dangerous distraction. They chatter and fidget and argue and whinge (“Are we there yet?”) and it’s impossible to ignore them because they make so much noise and they’re bloody persistent. In fact, my guess is that if all children under the age of 10 were banned from cars full stop, we’d see a huge – and I mean HUGE – reduction in the rate of road accidents caused by parents looking backwards at their offspring whilst driving forwards (and I see that one with frightening regularity). None would be subject to wicked tobacco smoke whilst trapped in airtight (yeah right!) cars, the walk to and from school every day might just go some way towards alleviating the oh-so-dreadful “obesity epidemic” that we’re always being warned about, and the regular exercise out in all that freshly-polluted air (isn't that good for us all, now??) would contribute beautifully to our lovely, cuddly, concerned-for-the-people Government’s “nudge” programme to get everyone rigorously adhering to their desired 1984-style daily Physical Jerks.

Now, who’s going to suggest that one to the BMA??

George Speller said...

It's a long time since trade unions ran the country . . . . .

v for v3 said...

smoking in cars a health-hazard? gord-almighty, this is the last bleedin' straw from our hypocritical hierarchy - what about ground-to-air missiles around the olympic bleedin' stadium, answer me that cameron, you dick? i tell you, i live in hackney and people 'round here ain't too smitten with the proposal, believe me. yes, for once, the inter-gang rivalries have been put aside and we here in the east-end are up in unified bleedin' arms against this potty policy - coz wot even every ignorant-as-shit state-edumasicated sod hereabouts knows is that 'what goes up, must come down', most likely on top of one of our heads or tower blocks. its' a bleedin' assault on one of the most deprived inner-city areas of london - it's racist, it's class bleedin' warfare mate. we didn't want the olympics here anyway - they were always going to be a health-and-safety hazard whilst we were over there bombarding civilian populations in the middle-east, now our government wants to turn its weapons on us, their own bleedin' citizens. crikey guy, we should never have been allowed to stage the olympic whilst we were at war - it was a crazy idea, not to mention immoral. why couldn't they have built the stadium in the middle of the sahara bleedin' desert or next to buckingham palace or something? i live within a rocket's trajectory of this bleedin' nightmare and me and all the neighbours are consulting the law centre - we want the olympics cancelled, on helf-und-safety grounds. now.

see you in court cameron, you gold-meddling crock-of-crud.

sexy sam's spam cam said...

05:20

fancy smoked-cockney for breakie, darling?

sexy sam's spam cam said...

ya? ok, i'll do one garnished in fag-ends and seasoned with skol super-strength as usual, dave, dearest.

JuliaM said...

At least this brought out the 'Mash's' most inspired column so far...

talwin said...

Why not take two minutes to email the BMA (as I, a non-smoker, have done), and tell them to mind their own business.

boris blunderbuss said...

05:20

fear not folks - i'll be manning the gun-tower, finger on the trigger ready to take a pop at any pesky incoming party-pooper.

ps:

à propos collateral cocknicide, i'm assured that the missiles are 'intelligent', so that's comforting...maybe one or two wouldn't go amiss in downing street, or city hall.

dicky bankson said...

05:20

such a pity that these anti-capitalism professors at st paul's can't shift their arses over to stratford to protest about something real, such as the murder of civilian populations by our military - and corruption of the relationship which shouldn't exist between business and government, perhaps...

...but capitalism? come now - surely we're all guilty of buying into that concept at some level?

doodlebugged said...

05:20

don't you mean v to v3?

value added vampire said...

23:27

errr...apparently the venture scalpers have decamped into an empty bank over the borough-line in hackney - i hope they're going to pay their council tax like all good little socialists should...

...and presumably they're right behind angela merkel on the financial transactions tax - which will not only leech off the banks, but will drain everyone else's accounts too...

...perhaps our crusty commie campers are actually krautie campers - angela's special agents of subversive accountancy...a german guerilla group of undercanvas tax-collectors, who are on a secret mission to sell us all into euro-tax-slavery...

...or henchmen of the new world standing-order whose ultimate dastardly aim is to enrich the errr...bilderbergers and bankers...?

...it's fucking spooky if you ask me.

this mission will self-destruct in a five-year-plan said...

00:34

very interesting analysis, vampire...you know, you can always tell a cia decoy operation designed to take the sting (and the piss) out of the comrades' revolution...you see, by concentrating their campaign on the futile goal of defeating capitalism (a fancy general term for common-or-garden business and barter), the anti-caps have set up an integrally corrupted movement programmed, from the outset, to fail - it's a microcosm of the wider socialist cause, if you like...specially formulated by the cia to be bio-degradable wherever it is planted.

double-barreled bollux said...

21:08

one thing that unifies the allegedly opposing members of capitalist bourgeousie and the revolution is their unending greed for power, money and status - it sure stinks of a communo-capitalist conspiracy.

opinions powered by SendLove.to