tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post4967161877606640029..comments2024-02-06T07:57:54.467+00:00Comments on underdogs bite upwards: Up the Injunction.Leg-ironhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04932361799889315359noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-37682901305834742802011-05-26T03:30:36.880+01:002011-05-26T03:30:36.880+01:00Hm. It seems Glen Orchy is typo-inducing.Hm. It seems Glen Orchy is typo-inducing.Leg-ironhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04932361799889315359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-77912781948274943962011-05-26T03:29:38.499+01:002011-05-26T03:29:38.499+01:00There's an issue beyond whether the woman plan...There's an issue beyond whether the woman planned blackmail or any of the rest of the injunction story.<br /><br />Now that twitter are being sued (it's not likely to work), Dommie the Grieve is in a difficult position.<br /><br />If he doesn't prosecute those Twitterers who broke the injunction, he allows all futue injucntions to be ignored. <br /><br />If he does and fails, he's going to look a right twat.<br /><br />If he does and succeeds, he's going to look a right twat.<br /><br />If I was him, I'd resign quick and hand the job to some sucker. In fact, if I was an MP of any party now, I'd resign quick before the whole lot blows.<br /><br />It's only a matter of time.Leg-ironhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04932361799889315359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-90359140594484987692011-05-25T21:25:55.321+01:002011-05-25T21:25:55.321+01:00Actually, what Squeeze were referring to in that s...Actually, what Squeeze were referring to in that song was <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062426/" rel="nofollow">this</a><br /><br /><br />But he was a stupid git to take out that injunction. Now there are two things I know about him: he pays football for some team, and he's a stupid git.dakhttp://tpdrsl.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-75096572300120015222011-05-25T20:58:38.859+01:002011-05-25T20:58:38.859+01:00If you say so, Julia.If you say so, Julia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-50894212939059350602011-05-25T04:58:10.094+01:002011-05-25T04:58:10.094+01:00"It seems that she was trying to blackmail hi...<i>"It seems that she was trying to blackmail him. "</i><br /><br />Shouldn't that be 'it is CLAIMED she was trying to blackmail him'..?JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-71113842318206000802011-05-25T01:40:17.820+01:002011-05-25T01:40:17.820+01:00I think that we forget something, here.
Have you ...I think that we forget something, here.<br /><br />Have you seen the 'glamour' pictures of this strumpet, Imogen? <br /><br />It seems that she was trying to blackmail him. So maybe, from his point of view, it was better to go for the injunction to stop the potential blackmail rather than go to the police. The police would want to investigate, but the judge doesn't. Maybe it was anticipated by Giggs's advisors that the truth would out, but no great harm has been done to Giggs - the police are not investigating his conduct. As regards the MSM, all he has to do is keep shtum - it will be yesterday's news in a fortnight. That would not be the case if the police were involved. Isn't that what Terry did? Does anyone give a damn about Terry's little bit of fun with a strumpet anymore? For that is what all these footballer events are - some bird makes it clear in no uncertain terms that she wants to shag (women are just as 'lusty' as men, when they want to be), and the little devil takes over. IT IS VERY COMMON. <br /><br />So Giggs has paid his lawyers £50 grand. If he has not arranged a refund, he is a fool. But now he can report the blackmail attempt. Note that the matter now becomes 'sub judice', which is a different matter altogether. It will be interesting to see whether or not a report appears that Imogen has been 'questioned' - once the fuss has died down. BLACKMAIL IS A VERY SERIOUS OFFENCE. <br /><br />Giggs (and his advisors) might be a damn sight cleverer than they are given credit for.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-22349376651983269542011-05-25T01:28:13.067+01:002011-05-25T01:28:13.067+01:00I actually taught the guy, well, he wasn't a g...I actually taught the guy, well, he wasn't a guy then, just a year 11 yoof. All I can say is this, the guy has good taste.timbonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06985165416240833253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-12984419307759026712011-05-25T00:52:41.447+01:002011-05-25T00:52:41.447+01:00@ Slamlander.
Americans - free! Are you joking? F...@ Slamlander.<br /><br />Americans - free! Are you joking? Fat slobs terrified of a whiff of tobacco smoke? Free! Quel comicality!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-88121488970299883592011-05-24T20:24:27.564+01:002011-05-24T20:24:27.564+01:00The one point that everyone misses is that you can...The one point that everyone misses is that you can get censorship via injunction in the UK. That is by no means a free-press. As an American, I am flabbergasted that you can even get such a thing and call yourselves free.Slamlanderhttp://Slamlander.Caselle-VPN.Netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-29044364136079043572011-05-24T15:53:22.516+01:002011-05-24T15:53:22.516+01:00Battle royal here and the winner is going to be th...Battle royal here and the winner is going to be the impracticality of prosecution for any of us.James Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14525082702330365464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-67512597759806610242011-05-24T09:48:20.097+01:002011-05-24T09:48:20.097+01:00Brilliant post and brilliant reply from Mr Davies....Brilliant post and brilliant reply from Mr Davies. As for "Go and do something useful like counting the dust particles on Gordon Brown's Commons seat.", that's a pretty unsavoury place for anybody to go and now frequented by Nasaled.Oldrightiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03192587284458430556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-8431788792625804452011-05-24T08:12:53.580+01:002011-05-24T08:12:53.580+01:00All this would not matter at all if millions and m...All this would not matter at all if millions and millions of hapless, blameless people had not been infantilised by socialist education. This has caused them to regard with orgasmic interest and compulsion to know, the extra-marital sexual doings of "celebrities" and "role models". All these "role models" have been shagging whom they could (which was, functionally, everyone available) since God was in short trousers. Look at Henry VIII for example, a "role model" for another time.<br /><br />If people had been allowed free reign to their natural curiosity about important matters instead, through a proper education sysytem and not one designed by stalinists to render them uncurious helots interested only in the transient joys of reproduction, then all this kind of information would be of no interest, and "papers" like the NoW would have folded.David Davishttp://libertarianalliance.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2170981338945747646.post-7886126801035339002011-05-24T07:50:23.693+01:002011-05-24T07:50:23.693+01:00Schillings really should have explained about the ...Schillings really should have explained about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect" rel="nofollow">Streisand Effect</a>.<br /><br />It was interesting, too, that on Twitter, the most outraged about the public contempt for the superinjunction (and thereby, the justice system that imposed it, in the teeth of the real world) were lawyers.<br /><br />Qui bono indeed...JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.com